Definite matrix: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
add section on non-Hermitian matrices
add section on non-Hermitian matrices
Line 68:
A real matrix ''M'' may have the property that ''x''<sup>T</sup>''Mx'' > 0 for all nonzero real vectors ''x'' without being symmetric. The matrix
:<math> \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} </math>
provides an example. In general, we have ''x''<sup>T</sup>''Mx'' > 0 for all real nonzero vectors ''x'' if and only if the symmetric part, (''M'' + ''M''^<subsup>T</subsup>) / 2, is positive definite.
 
The situation for complex matrices may be different, depending on how one generalizes the inequality ''z''<sup>*</sup>''AzMz'' > 0. If ''z''<sup>*</sup>''AzMz'' is real for all complex vectors ''z'', then the matrix ''AM'' is necessarily Hermitian. So, if we require that ''z''<sup>*</sup>''AzMz'' be real and positive, then ''AM'' is automatically Hermitian. On the other hand, we have that Re(''z''<sup>*</sup>''AzMz'') > 0 for all complex nonzero vectors ''z'' if and only if the Hermitian part, (''AM'' + ''AM''^<sub>*</sub>) / 2, is positive definite.
 
There is no agreement in the literature on the proper definition of ''positive-definite'' for non-Hermitian matrices.