Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lolcode: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
"It exists" is not a reason to have an article on the subject |
Adding unsigned template and comment |
||
Line 27:
***I ''wanted'' to type, "Delete: No coverage in reliable sources and no notability as a programming language." But the temptation was too great. [[User:Serpent's Choice|Serpent's Choice]] 20:20, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
* '''Merge''' as proposed. It's interesting, but not notable enough to have its own page. [[User:Taral|Taral]] 21:48, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
* '''Comment''', I don't understand why so many people think it should be merged. Though though LOLCODE draws from LOLcat, they are unrelated. One is a programming language while the other is a meme. If languages such as [[Brainfuck]] and [[Whitespace]] have their own pages, why shouldn't LOLCODE?{{unsigned2|21:50, June 2, 2007|71.61.15.192}}
**The issue is [[WP:N|notability]]. The language doesn't have any, the meme does, and LOLOCODE draws its inspiration from the meme. It isn't notable enough for its own article, but it'd be worth a small section in the LOLCAT article.
* '''Keep''' it is a programming language [[User:Kevin Ricci|Kevin Ricci]] 22:01, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
**Please provide a reason within Wikipedia policies for keeping. We know it's a programming language, but existance is not a reason for something to have an article. -- [[User:Kesh|Kesh]] 03:41, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
| |||