Revision as of 03:03, 6 April 2007 edit CBM (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 55,390 edits m remove maths rating template (manual edit under 6/minute) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:35, 20 June 2007 edit undo Nagle (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 16,117 edits Pay site link needs fix. Next edit →
Line 13: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/papers/cs/17667/ftp:zSzzSzftp.inrialpes.frzSzpubzSzsharpzSzpublicationszSzsundaraj:etal:iros:00.pdf/sundaraj00new.pdf That paper ~~acutally~~actually describes a few problems with GJK. I had this problems also in ~~practise~~practice. Should maybe mentioned. -- [[User:62.134.229.57\|62.134.229.57]] 13:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC) : Amusingly, that paper cites my posting to comp.graphics.algorithms as identifying the problem. The Steven Cameron paper cited in the article has some of the answers. That needs a better cite; the link is to the IEEE repository, which is, annoyingly, a pay site. --[[User:Nagle\|John Nagle]] 04:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Gilbert–Johnson–Keerthi distance algorithm: Difference between revisions