Talk:Glacier National Park (U.S.): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
mark as {{FTCfailed}}, Replaced: FTC| → FTCfailed| using AWB
Pls fix missing ref
Line 136:
We have bird woman falls listed as "perhaps the tallest waterfall" in the park. "Perhaps" seems odd phrasing--one would think it either would be or wouldn't be the tallest. The reference just gives a height, and [http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:rgpvMnwC3ZUJ:www.world-waterfalls.com/spreadsheet.php%3Fs%3DN%26t%3DH%26orderby%3Dheight%26sortLimit%3D300+glacier+national+park+waterfalls+492+ft&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=3] would seem to indicate that it may not in fact be the tallest. Unless I'm missing something here, we should probably remove the claim. --[[User:Robth|Robth]]<sup>[[User Talk:Robth|Talk]]</sup> 01:47, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
:I couldn't find a listing of tallest waterfalls for the park. I'll change it if it hasn't been done so already.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] 02:26, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 
==Missing ref==
The article has been missing a ref since [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glacier_National_Park_%28US%29&diff=prev&oldid=117023652 this edit of March 22,] when the glaciers gone by 2030 statement was sourced to a named ref "retreat", but there is no named ref "retreat". Was there supposed to be a different ref named "retreat", or should the original source be restored? [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 02:43, 27 June 2007 (UTC)