Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:03, 25 May 2005

Revision as of 10:02, 25 May 2005

Line 53:

===Statement by party 1===

I am requesting arbitration against Skyring on behalf of the editors working on [[Government of Australia]]. In my opinion the dispute only concerns content. Skyring disputes the content of the article; he wishes to introduce what I will describe as original research since he is yet to provide references for his assertions. His edits to the article are disruptive and usually start edit wars. AAn informal poll conducted, see [[Talk:Government of Australia/archive 5]], shows that 12/12 editors with an interest in the page and Australian constitutional law agree that Skyrings changes to the article are incorrect (for want of a better word).

[[User:Adam Carr]] has initiated a poll to make a policy especially for Goverment of Australia, I hazard to say in desperation after 5 months of ciruclar discussion on the topic, where Skyrings edits would be reverted on sight unless backed up with references on the talk page. I think this poll would set a bad presedent if it were to be implemented, and request rather that the ArbCom consider resticting Skyrings ability to edit on the subjects where he is being disruptive--[[User:Petaholmes|nixie]] 06:29, 25 May 2005 (UTC)