Content deleted Content added
Line 578:
::My mistake. I misread the "Active CANDU Reactors" section of the article and thought that India built Candu derivatives to develop nuclear weapons. Can AECL take India to court since the latter is essentially using the former's work? [[User:195.14.142.140|195.14.142.140]] 19:13, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
:::There is nothing illegal about India's reverse-engineering of CANDU, and in fact one of the attractions of CANDU trade deals is their high technology-transfer content, to a wide vareity of economies (for the same reason that Canada was able to construct a CANDU using its domestic industry). This is particularly attractive today since much of the world lacks the ability to build the large forged components of a PWR. [[User:Whitlock|Whitlock]] 13:17, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
| |||