Content deleted Content added
the Company Name needs immediate attention |
|||
Line 38:
::: This link proves nothing. Its a third party article--[[User:Snjv|Snjv]] 20:19, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
::::There is no legitimate, technical question about the "For-Profit" status. The company is neither a foundation or organization. As the name suggests, its a "Non Public Corporation". Its upto the company to declare its NON-Profit status if applicable. As it has not declared that, Its very natural and sensible to consider it a "For-Profit" entity. THe deceptions stems from the use by company of public figures in personal capacity (X officials from UNESCO and other professionals). And aggressive marketing campaigns by commercial media to encourage paid voting. Hence its important to make that clear to the visitors. Cause if Wikipedia doesnt do that, WHO WILL ?--[[User:Snjv|Snjv]] 20:43, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
==21 or 22==
| |||