Content deleted Content added
Line 164:
:An obvious sock. Even if the ban is in limbo at the moment, it's not appropriate to create multiple socks to avoid the scrutiny of other editors per [[WP:SOCK]], and other currently active socks are known. Second, the user cannot legitimately claim to be keeping heated issues in one area as the policy allows, as the user has used multiple socks on this article. Because of my prior experience with this user, however, I have essentially exhausted any persuasiveness I had on point, so I will not block the sock myself. '''· <font color="#70A070">[[User:Jersyko|jersyko]]</font>''' ''<font color="#007BA7" size="1">[[User talk:Jersyko|talk]]</font>'' 20:05, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
::Understandable. I hope that another admin will pick it up, however. See the Rfc respondent above as well. As far as I can see, the ban itself has not been contested - only one of the proven socks, for unclear reasons. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 06:42, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
== more books? ==
| |||