Content deleted Content added
m →this page needs a reboot: my only reminder is that wiki rules would apply |
m →this page needs a reboot: there are many types of end-users of the computational |
||
Line 44:
:Have at it. The page currently has more of an [[operational#Relevance to process|operational]] flavor than it could have for several reasons. As mentioned in the above section "Sources" where this same topic was brought up, we need a re-write with citations and ought to balance the academic and the 'practice' viewpoints. Plus, a look at the history of who owns computing (and the related thought, for that matter) might have some consideration. IMHO. This topic is not as trivial as it might appear. [[User:JMSwtlk|jmswtlk]] 14:08, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
As this is re-worked, there needs to be a full spectrum of viewpoints covered. For example, the [http://www.acm.org/pubs/cacm/ July CACM] has a column which considers that computing is now more a [http://www.acm.org/pubs/cacm/toc/2007/july_toc.html natural science] than just a tool. Computational directly supports the [[Scientific method#Computational approaches|scientific method]], and discussions of it and its use are integral to our [[quasi-empirical|basis]], [[operational definition|operational]] and otherwise. [[User:64Plus|64Plus]] 14:49, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
| |||