Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relationship Approach to Systems Development: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 9:
*'''Comment''' I just read the article, and I still have no idea what it's talking about. I'm guessing that this mightmeet the criteria for deletion simply because it seem to be a piece of copywritten trade-related promotional paraphernalia. Still, I'm not voting because I still don't really understand it. To make things easier for us, and simply because wikipedia is meant to be accessible to the general public, I ask that ''anyone who understands the article, please edit it accordingly, and if you can't be bothered to do that, at least tell us what on earth it's talking about''. [[User:Calgary|Calgary]] 02:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
*A link has been added to define a RAD. I will add additional links for clarity. Please click on the RAD, RUP, SDLC link for additional clarity. RASD is a software methodology useful for implementing package applications. If you were a software development professional, you would probably immediately understand its worth. Please refrain from deleting until the article can be fully posted over the next few days. It would be a disservice to the software community.{{unsigned|Itsme01}}
:*Yes, that's part of my concern. I understand that some wikipedia articles af primarily of interest to certain groups, but I'm pretty sure that articles should be written in a style that makes the information accessible to wikipedia's diverse audience I mean, I have trouble reading articles about mathematical formulas, but in that case the article is usually well-written, and it's my fault because I'm not exceptional with math. This article, however, is long-winded and pedantic, and so heavily leaden with jargon that I'd be surprised if ''anyone'' other than a software development professional would understand it. I'm also concerned that the article is only of significance to a very specific group (the afforementioned software community).
In any case, I've found the justification for deletion. The article makes no assertion of [[WP:NOTE|notability]], even within the software community. Even more to the point, it appears to be in pretty strong violation of [[WP:NOT#GUIDE]]. So I'm going to have to go with '''DELETE''' [[User:Calgary|Calgary]] 03:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' I have read the artical several times and i'm still not sure what it is. [[User:Oysterguitarist|Oyster]][[User talk:Oysterguitarist|'''guitarist''']] 02:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
| |||