Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relationship Approach to Systems Development: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 11:
:*Yes, that's part of my concern. I understand that some wikipedia articles af primarily of interest to certain groups, but I'm pretty sure that articles should be written in a style that makes the information accessible to wikipedia's diverse audience I mean, I have trouble reading articles about mathematical formulas, but in that case the article is usually well-written, and it's my fault because I'm not exceptional with math. This article, however, is long-winded and pedantic, and so heavily leaden with jargon that I'd be surprised if ''anyone'' other than a software development professional would understand it. I'm also concerned that the article is only of significance to a very specific group (the afforementioned software community). In any case, I've found the justification for deletion. The article makes no assertion of [[WP:NOTE|notability]], even within the software community. Even more to the point, it appears to be in pretty strong violation of [[WP:NOT#GUIDE]]. So I'm going to have to go with '''DELETE''' [[User:Calgary|Calgary]] 03:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' I have read the artical several times and i'm still not sure what it is. [[User:Oysterguitarist|Oyster]][[User talk:Oysterguitarist|'''guitarist''']] 02:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as apparent [[WP:VSCA]], I know what software methodologies are, I'm not snowed by the jargon, and this is not a notable one. I think this [http://www.guru.com/emp/search_results2.cfm?PID2=7631486651724652&catid=1000&subid=1007&keywords=&ko=3 guru.com] page says all you need to know: ''Tracy Oden is a Customer Relationship Management (CRM) strategy, methodology, implementation and change management expert. She is the author of a CRM implementation methodology entitled The Relationship Approach to Systems Development (RASD)™''. There are literally no other relevant results on Google Web, Google Books, Google News or Google News Archive. Widely used methodologies are written about endlessly in terms of case studies, how-tos and so forth. This one hasn't been. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 03:49, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
| |||