Whois: differenze tra le versioni

Contenuto cancellato Contenuto aggiunto
Annullata la modifica 143804910 di 5.91.121.151 (discussione). Telnet non è un'alternativa a whois.
Etichetta: Annulla
FrescoBot (discussione | contributi)
m Bot: numeri di pagina nei template citazione
Riga 26:
Nel 2003 una commissione dell'[[IETF]] venne formata per creare un nuovo standard per cercare informazioni su nomi a dominio e [[indirizzo IP|numeri di rete]]: ''Cross Registry Information Service Protocol'' (CRISP).<ref>{{cita web|autore=Cathy Murphy|titolo=CRISP (Cross-Registry Information Service Protocol) Working Group Meeting Minutes|url=https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/58/104.htm|editore=IETF|accesso=1º giugno 2015|urlarchivio=https://web.archive.org/web/20150601224705/https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/58/104.htm|città=Minneapolis, Minnesota USA|data=2 ottobre 2003|lingua=en|citazione=The CRISP (Cross-Registry Information Service Protocol) WG will define a standard mechanism that can be used for finding authoritative information associated with a label, a protocol to transport queries and responses for accessing that information, and a first profile (schema & queries) to support commonly-required queries for ___domain registration information.}}</ref>
Tra gennaio 2005 e luglio 2006, il nome provvisorio per questa nuova proposta di standard era ''[[Internet Registry Information Service]]'' (IRIS).<ref>
{{cita pubblicazione|autore=Andrew Newton|titolo=Replacing the Whois Protocol: IRIS and the IETF's CRISP Working Group|pubblicazione=IEEE Internet Computing|data=luglio 2006|volume=10|numero=4|pp=79–8479-84|doi=10.1109/MIC.2006.86|url=http://www.computer.org/csdl/mags/ic/2006/04/w4079-abs.html|accesso=1º giugno 2015|lingua=en|citazione=The Nicname/Whois protocol has served well, but it remains unchanged since it was first published in the early 1980s, despite great change in the infrastructure and administration of the Internet. There is now more diversity with ___domain names and IP networks and associated contacts, as well as among the users submitting queries via Whois. The protocol is now so fragmented in terms of information flow and output that queries yield inconsistent results under current conditions. To address the needs of today's Internet, the IETF Cross Registry Internet Service Protocol (CRISP) working group is developing a new protocol, the Internet Registry Information Service (IRIS), to replace Whois.|urlarchivio=https://web.archive.org/web/20150602094505/http://www.computer.org/csdl/mags/ic/2006/04/w4079-abs.html}}
</ref><ref>
{{cita web|autore=Marcos Sanz|autore2=Andrew Newton|autore3=Leslie Daigle|titolo=The Internet Registry Information Service (IRIS) Protocol|url=https://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/whois-privacy/sanz-whois-12jan05.pdf|editore=Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)|accesso=1º giugno 2015|urlarchivio=https://web.archive.org/web/20150601232742/https://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/whois-privacy/sanz-whois-12jan05.pdf|data=12 gennaio 2005|lingua=en|citazione=CRISP – Cross-Registry Internet Service Protocol: The CRISP Working Group was tasked with finding a solution to the problems that currently infest the Nicname/Whois protocol. The CRISP Working Group created a list of functional requirements. Proposals meeting these requirements were evaluated. IRIS was selected as the protocol to publish as a standard. Now an IETF Proposed Standard: RFCs: 3981, 3982, 3983}}</ref>