Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Programmer's Truth Theory: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ravenswing (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 7:
*'''Strong delete'''. Original research, as admitted to by original editor. No independent sources, so it is not verifiable. In absence for a scholarly claim about the theory, it is not notable. (The article is cohesive enough that it's not patent nonsense, so I don't see a criterion under which it can be speedily deleted.) —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 16:55, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
*'''20-Mule-Team Delete:''' There's not a ''single'' Google hit for this soi-disant unsourced, OR-by-definition theory, not even from this article, which is truly impressive. Toss in [[WP:COI]], since the article's creator and editor is [[User talk:Brichard12]], and there you have it. [[User:RGTraynor|'''<span style="background:Blue;color:Cyan"> RGTraynor </span>''']] 17:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
*'''Strong delete''', the complete lack of GHits says it all. Definitely [[WP:NEO|neologism]], perhaps [[WP:NFT|made up one day]]. [[User:TenPoundHammer|<span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>]] • <sup>((([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Broken clamshells]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otter chirps]])))</sup> 17:40, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
| |||