Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Programmer's Truth Theory: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ravenswing (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 11:
I have provided support for my theory in a referenced publication within the article. [[User:Brichard12|Brichard12]] 17:41, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
:*'''Comment:''' Errr ... in a paper some folks presented at a symposium? Do you have any publication history, ''by name'', in a major peer-reviewed journal? [[User:RGTraynor|'''<span style="background:Blue;color:Cyan"> RGTraynor </span>''']] 17:49, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
::* Papers presented at major conferences are generally considered reliable sources. They are typically published by the conference organiser (in this case the IEEE), and I believe most such conferences require peer review before allowing a paper to be presented. However all this source does is suggest that the research in question in this article is even ''less'' notable, because all it is doing is reiterating something already known: that incorrect assumptions lead to errors. We now have a source that shows that this has been known and commented on since 2004 at the latest, and given that it isn't presented in the paper as a new concept one can assume earlier. [[User:JulesH|JulesH]] 19:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
| |||