Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Programmer's Truth Theory: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:42, 16 July 2007

Revision as of 00:40, 17 July 2007

Line 17:

*'''Delete''' but a good idea to bring it here--simpler & more definitive than a RfC. Most conference papers are not significant, but IEEE is somewhat of an exception. Still, even if it had really been one the subject, one conference pape even at the best conferences would almost never be enough.'''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 04:35, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. In academic computer science publication, selective conferences can be more significant than journals. But one paper with [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?num=20&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&cites=13694536279559700403 a modest number of citations] is still only a weak indicator of notability. And more to the point, I don't see a lot of support for the article within the cited paper. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] 16:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

The paper I cited in the reference connotes the justification for the theory through the studies that were conducted of end-user programmers. While the theory is not literally suggested within the article of reference, it is explained in a way which evoked the theory; thus the theory evolved from out of my interpretation of the article's evidentiary studies. [[User:Brichard12|Brichard12]] 00:40, 17 July 2007 (UTC)