Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Programmer's Truth Theory: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 00:40, 17 July 2007

Revision as of 00:48, 17 July 2007

Line 18:

*'''Delete'''. In academic computer science publication, selective conferences can be more significant than journals. But one paper with [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?num=20&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&cites=13694536279559700403 a modest number of citations] is still only a weak indicator of notability. And more to the point, I don't see a lot of support for the article within the cited paper. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] 16:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

The paper I cited in the reference connotes the justification for the theory through the studies that were conducted of end-user programmers. While the theory is not literally suggestedreference from within the article ofI referencecited, it isexplains explainedthe inideas aendemic way which evokedto the theory; thus the theory evolved from out of my interpretation of the article's evidentiary studies. [[User:Brichard12|Brichard12]] 00:40, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

I think that it is absurd to suggest that I must write a treatise or a national publication of some sort describing a theory I developed just to get a blurb entry of it on Wikipedia. If that is what it takes to promote ideas to the masses on Wikipedia, then we should all be relegated to reading the hard-copy edition of the written word and disabuse ourselves of the collaborative ideas and thoughts that are manifested through an international, interactive human encyclopedia called the internet... [[User:Brichard12|Brichard12]] 00:48, 17 July 2007 (UTC)