Revision as of 12:55, 23 July 2007 edit 84.9.163.228 (talk) →The rationals ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:15, 23 July 2007 edit undo CBM (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 55,390 edits →Complete is the wrong word: comment Next edit →
Line 86: *The text seems fine, it does not say that c is greater than every element in A and less than every element in B.--[[User:Patrick\|Patrick]] 11:23, 7 June 2007 (UTC) Note: the term "gapless" may be better than "complete". --[[User:TedPavlic\|TedPavlic]] 21:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC) The article linked to complete lattices, and you're right the reals are not a complete lattice. They are a complete metric space, but that is not the subject here. I reworded it a little. I don't think "gapless" is better - we should try to explain things, but not to the point of inventing our own terminology. — Carl <small>([[User:CBM\|CBM]] · [[User talk:CBM\|talk]])</small> 13:15, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Cantor's first set theory article/Archive 1: Difference between revisions