Revision as of 00:53, 29 July 2007 edit Madman (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 15,171 edits m AWB? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:14, 29 July 2007 edit undo Smith609 (talk \| contribs) Administrators 38,083 edits m →Discussion Next edit →
Line 35: Why can't you just use AWB for this task? It's a one-time task, and <600 pages transclude {{tl\|Infobox Journal}}. — [[User:Madman bum and angel\|Madman bum and angel]] ([[User talk:Madman bum and angel\|talk]] – [[User:Madman bum and angel/Desk\|desk]]) 00:53, 29 July 2007 (UTC) ===Replies=== Sorry - I hadn't realised that this was a high edit rate. I'll change the limit to 8epm - which will probably be difficult to attain anyway, as I'm manually checking each correction. As to why not use AWB: I'm relatively new to coding and am keen to get some useful experience in the world of bots (and there's nothing like the satisfaction of having done something yourself!) ''[[User:Verisimilus\|Verisimilus]]'' '''<small>[[User_talk:Verisimilus\|T]]</small>''' 08:14, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Infobox Journal Update Bot: Difference between revisions