Revision as of 21:00, 5 August 2007 edit Shadowcode (talk \| contribs) 29 edits →Procedural Programming != Procedural Generation ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:00, 5 August 2007 edit undo Shadowcode (talk \| contribs) 29 edits m →Procedural Programming != Procedural Generation Next edit →
Line 92: Now, I'm not going to remove this right now, I want to discuss this first. The thing is, the whole section being there doesn't make sense. [[Elite]], [[Quake]], [[Quake 2]], [[Quake 3]] and of course [[Spore]] are all written in an [[Object oriented programming]] language. If anything belongs in there it's.. oh I don't know.. Pac-Man? --[[User:Shadowcode\|<span style="font-variant:Small-caps;color:black;text-decoration: none">ShadowCode</span>]] 20:47, 5 August 2007 (UTC) :edit One more thing. The reason why everyone is saying procedural programming while they mean procedural generation is because some PR idiot at EA has been using that term to describe Spore. And you know, the press just takes it over and sooner or later everyone is talking about procedural programming. Gotta love hype and the buzzwords it generates, 'eh? --[[User:Shadowcode\|<span style="font-variant:Small-caps;color:black;text-decoration: none">ShadowCode</span>]] 21:00, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Procedural programming: Difference between revisions