Revision as of 04:41, 13 August 2007 edit Mets501 (talk \| contribs) 24,644 edits question ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:33, 13 August 2007 edit undo Android Mouse (talk \| contribs) 4,441 edits →Discussion: response Next edit →
Line 28: <!-- This is not a vote. It is a discussion --> Sounds good to me. Just one question: is there any safeguard against abuse? I guess it's not really necessary, but I'll let you or someone else give their opinion on that. What if a banned/blocked user is nominating many pages in bad faith? I guess it's rare enough that it's nothing really to worry about. —<span style="color: red;">[[User:Mets501\|M<small>ETS</small>501]] ([[User talk:Mets501\|talk]])</span> 04:41, 13 August 2007 (UTC) :I didn't think about any such safeguard. It would be possible to have it not issue notifications if the nominator is currently blocked. But I think this would be a rare problem, as I've never had issues with anyone abusing [[User:Android Mouse Bot 2\|Android Mouse Bot 2]], which issues notifications for speedy deletion. --[[User:Android Mouse\|Android Mouse]] 05:33, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Grim Reaper Bot: Difference between revisions