Revision as of 17:21, 8 August 2007 edit LittleDan (talk \| contribs) 4,726 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:05, 16 August 2007 edit undo Shabda (talk \| contribs) 465 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 4: [[User:Ceran\|Ceran]] 18:52, 17 May 2006 (UTC)Aside from answering the eternal question "What would Lisp look like backwards?", no, this language isn't very notable. That said, the previous commenter makes a good point in that there are articles on far less note-worthy topics. More importantly (and surprisingly), it still appears to be under active development. As of today, the author is making regular updates to his blog at http://factor-language.blogspot.com/. So who knows, maybe this boring love-child of Lisp and Forth might actually become useful. ::It is a actively developed language with practical work beinng done. [[User:Shabda\|Shabda]] 06:05, 16 August 2007 (UTC) ==Interpreted language?==

Talk:Factor (programming language): Difference between revisions