Wikipedia:Historical archive/Conflicts between users/Archive: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 31:
====Ban RK?====
*Yes (
*Temporarily(
**anthere. Respectfully, I placed a sort of summary of people opinion as expressed on the ml and elsewhere at [[User:Anthere/summary]] (there were so many discussions about whether this is allowed or not, and in which space, that I have no idea what is in the rules or against the rules.) Feel free to move it.
**[[User:rickyrab]] for being a nudnik (a pest) to the whole Jewish/Catholic debate.
**[[User:Cimon avaro|Cimon Avaro on a pogo-stick]] 04:50, 3 Oct 2003 (UTC) took a closer look at the specific events which precipitated the user block, RK is the one who was out of control at that particular point in time. He definitely needs to get control of himself, and realize that he is not indispensible to wikipedia.
**[[User:Ed Poor]] I changed my mind and now see the wisdom of [[Erik|User:Eloquence]]'s temporary ban (which is already over anyway!).
**[[User:Vudujava]] Unquestionably. I think the problem here is that people are weighing his contributions against his behavior. I really don't care if he wrote half of the 'pedia, the behavior exhibited by RK is unacceptable at any time. I disagree with the ban being lifted. I think an apology to the community is in order first. [[User:Vudujava|vudu]] 17:11, 3 Oct 2003 (UTC)
*Permanently (1)
**[[User:Jtdirl|FearÉIREANN]] (very reluctantly. RK's behaviour at this stage seems out of control and no amount of appeals to him to stop seem to work. Banning should be a last resort. As he ignores all appeals, POVs articles, blanks articles, calls 2/3 of wiki anti-semite (and wikipedia ''nazipedia'') what alternative is there? He has been shown a degree of toleration no-one else has been shown. Indeed many of those banned caused far less trouble and insulted far fewer people. If we don't impose a soft ban, how else are we going to deal with RK's at this stage disgraceful behaviour? And if we don't impose a soft ban, what sort of message will RK's continuing bad behaviour send to everyone else? So, in the belief that there is now no alternative, a reluctant 'yes')
| |||