Requests for new languages/Wikiversity Simple English: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
SleepyMode (talk | contribs) |
MarcoAurelio (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 32:
*I can find myself opposing this idea. How are we suppose to do WIkiversity Simple English when we already have content about basic English at en.wikiversity? This just seems to be useless. Are we going to simplify content that is already on Wikiversity? Why can't we hold a Simple Portal at the English Wikiversity? (you know... like a History Portal, Science Portal). Just all, in all (wrapping a sandwich with bacon), what is the whole use of this? --[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 20:42, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
**And per what Mu301 stated, en.wikiversity's cope is broad, so there is no need to make a simple WV, as simple WQ and WB both ended up in failure. This project '''might''' end up in the same way due to the same reasons stated against keeping WQ and WB. --[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 01:15, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
* I somewhat remember having been told not so long ago that no more simple project would be allowed, since they don't have a valid ISO code, nor they are sufficiently unique, etc. In short, while it is possible to open a request, that does not mean that the request can be approved. Maybe {{ping|MF-Warburg|p=}} can clarify on this and correct me if I'm wrong. —[[User:MarcoAurelio|Marco]][[User talk:MarcoAurelio|Aurelio]] 12:07, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
==Discussion==
| |||