Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia Foundation/2016/Community consultation/Knowledge: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}: new section |
→{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}: new section |
||
Line 2,307:
Approach 1 should begin by providing ways to at least accept common multimedia formats.
My least favorite is number six. I really scares me.--[[User:ArnoldReinhold|ArnoldReinhold]] ([[User talk:ArnoldReinhold|talk]]) 21:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
== 137.204.193.171 ==
<!-- This "subst:REVISIONUSER" bit will add your username automatically. Feel free to leave this line alone. -->
<small> Response by [[Special:Contributions/137.204.193.171|137.204.193.171]]</small> 17:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
=== 137.204.193.171's response to the critical question ===
Expand the availability of reliable sources for the editors (i.e Wikipedia Library), also by easing the access to them (also from a technological point of view).
Create and improve solutions to identify loops of information (i.e. wikipedia using a newspaper as source, butthe newspaper used wikipedia as source).
=== 137.204.193.171's top 2-3 (or share your own idea) ===
2,3,7.
| |||