Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Objectivist theory of value: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 42:
::::Because you were asking people to vote, but AFD is not a vote, but rather a discussion. Yet you said "IF you think the article not worthy of inclusion vote!" which pretty much strikes me as a request to vote. Especially since the request is hardly neutral on its own. Not a great problem, but a bad habit to get into. It's hard enough not thinking of this process as a voting one, let alone encouraging it. [[User:Mister.Manticore|Mister.Manticore]] 14:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
:::::You confuse my post at {{tl|PhilosophyTasks}} with my reply to [[User:Postmodern Beatnik|Postmodern Beatnik]]. [[User:Banno|Banno]] 23:55, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
::::::No, I'm not. I know they're different. My responses to that notice are above in my initial reply. This is about the *other* section of my response, which was concerning your remark here. Were you confused? [[User:Mister.Manticore|Mister.Manticore]] 00:44, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' This process has resulted in some improvement in the article. Nice work, Bastin8. No consensus has been reached here, but I still think the article is problematic. It might be worth considering a merge to [[Objectivist ethics]]. [[User:Banno|Banno]] 00:08, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' I was going to nominate objectivist ethics and politics because those are not used popularly or in scholarly media. they seem to be neologisms created to capture and redescribe a bit of objectivist ideology. --[[User:Buridan|Buridan]] 00:14, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
| |||