Concurrent constraint logic programming: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m sp: achived->achieved, evaluted->evaluated, multipe->multiple, committement->commitment(x2)
clarify first sentence
Line 1:
'''Concurrent constraint logic programming''' is a version of [[constraint logic programming]] aimed primarily at programming [[concurrent process]]es rather than (or in addition to) solving [[constraint satisfaction problem]]s. Goals in constraint logic programming are evaluated concurrently; a concurrent process is therefore programmed as the evaluation of a goal by the [[Interpreter (computing)|interpreter]].
 
Syntactically, concurrent constraints logic programs are similar to non-concurrent programs, the only exception being that clauses includes ''guards'', which are constraints that may block the applicability of the clause under some conditions. Semantically, concurrent constraint logic programming differs from its non-concurrent versions because a goal evaluation is intended to realize a concurrent process rather than finding a solution to a problem. Most notably, this difference affects how the interpreter behaves when more than one clause is applicable: non-concurrent constraint logic programming [[Recursion|recursively]] tries all clauses; concurrent constraint logic programming chooses only one. This is the most evident effect of an intended ''directionality'' of the interpreter, which never revise a choice it has previously taken. Other effects of this are the semantical possibility of having a goal that cannot be proved while the whole evaluation does not fail, and a particular way for equating a goal and a clause head.
 
[[Constraint handling rules]] can be seen as a form of concurrent constraint logic programming, but are used for programming a constraint simplificatorsimplifier or solver rather than concurrent processes.
 
==Description==