Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Objectivist theory of value: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 58:
(continued) Of course. A large part of the advantage that accrues to the encyclopaedia from the deletion process is the improvement of the articles that results from them being listed[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Objectivist_theory_of_value&diff=153832987&oldid=152501401]. The improvements are pleasing, but not sufficient for me to withdraw the request for deletion, because the notability of the topic remains to be demonstrated within the article. But that is not a problem for the editors, since there is no consensus to delete. I suggest that this AfD now be closed with the conclusion: no consensus. Does anyone object? [[User:Banno|Banno]] 23:37, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
::I certainly don't, I'm certainly not convinced to keep, but I'm not concerned about the subject of the article being any kind of problem, so it's one of the many things that can be tabled and considered again at a later date. [[User:Mister.Manticore|Mister.Manticore]] 00:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' 'Verifiable' and 'reliable' sources exist for the content of this article. The sources in use, according to the example given in [[WP:NN]] for <nowiki>'Significant Coverage'</nowiki>, are significant. As far as the sourced content is concerned, there is no way it is original research. However, despite not being original-research, its content should be merged with sections in other articles such as Hume and Objectivism. Although the theory is essential to Objectivism, I don't think it is essential to wikipedia as a separate article.
| |||