Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alister MacKenzie: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Alister MacKenzie]]: '''Keep''' |
|||
Line 11:
*'''Delete''' to discourage people from posting crappy substubs. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] 09:43, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. Stubs serve a valid purpose. In fact, it '''is''' better to have a stub than nothing. The alternative is akin to mowing the saplings because they aren't trees yet. Prune, water and fertilize. [[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 05:38, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
**Most stubs are better than nothing. Poorly written, POV substubs in general are not. Now, rather than talking about these needed changes, anyone feel like ''making'' them? The article's been sitting around for a while in the exact same pisspoor form. I actually fully expected the article would have been made into an adequate stub by now so I could change my vote, but I see it hasn't. -[[User:R. fiend|R. fiend]] 14:30, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
|