Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Objectivist theory of value: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Relisting debate |
|||
Line 60:
*'''Merge''' 'Verifiable' and 'reliable' sources exist for the content of this article. The sources in use, according to the example given in [[WP:NN]] for <nowiki>'Significant Coverage'</nowiki>, are significant. As far as the sourced content is concerned, there is no way it is original research. However, despite not being original-research, its content should be merged with sections in other articles such as Hume and Objectivism. Although the theory is essential to Objectivism, I don't think it is essential to wikipedia as a separate article. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Karbinski|Karbinski]] ([[User talk:Karbinski|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Karbinski|contribs]]) 14:54, 31 August 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
*'''Keep''' - Referent aside, the concept is well-known in the context of Objectivism, as Bastin shows. — <span style="font:bold 11px Arial;display:inline;border:#000066 1px solid;background-color:#ECF1F7;padding:0 4px 0 4px;">[[User:XDanielx|xDanielx]]</span> <sup>[[User_talk:XDanielx|T]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/XDanielx|C]]</sub> 06:17, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
<hr style="width:50%;"/>
:<span style="color:Chocolate;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Citicat|<b><font color="#FF0000">Citi</font><font color="#151B8D">Cat</font></b>]]<small><font color="#000000"><sup>[[User_talk:Citicat| ♫]]</sup></font></small> 02:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
| |||