Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Nick Gabrichidze: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Gabrichidze (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Gabrichidze (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 8:
[[User:Ell|Ell]] 17 : 40 pm, 18 June (UTC)
== About inserting the images at Plato, Flying Dutchman or other pages ==
'''Unofficial note''':Dear Irpen we appreciate your support(and especially support from [[user:sparkit]] who seems to be a professional in art research and surrealism history; even if page will be removed his opinion is very valuable for us)
But there is something you have mentioned which we sincerely do not understand: I would understand someone voting against keeping this page here, but what's wrong with contributing images of Nick Gabrichidze as an illustration to other articles? Would wikipedia have ton's of image data to illustrate the content and would we remove some other images to insert ours the frustration of wikipdians would be acceptable. But what is the objection against inserting some attractive graphical material to the pages which used to be absolutely image-empty, with just a plain text? I mean we can remove those images, but what's a point to contribute something at all to this resource then if every new contribution would be seen as insolence? Seriously why not to assume some good faith?
Would we put let's say image of mural with Bob Marley or the Pop art style image to the Plato page it would be idiocy and vandalism. But what was put there is a accurate reflection of "Plato’s cave" concept, the allegory created by Plato himself. It is not an abstract work which requires some extra understanding, it is a figurative image which is displaying the concept accurately. Same for other images-if wikipedians do not see how image of "Mermaids" at the "[[mermaid]]" page is connected with a content, please tell us what’s wrong. May be you will convince us and we will reconsider.
Some people claim that images of "more notable paintings" should be put there. Fair enough, but so far no one bothered to find and put any image as far as we see. We are inserting something we consider interesting, and if someone has more interesting image-please offer it, we will be glad to see. But how can user be sanctioned for adding obviously topic related visual material to the content? If the fact that artists name is present on each image is irritating for you, then please note that it is not only acceptable but absolutely necessary for copyright reasons.
I hope we made our motivation clear, but if there is another opinion please share it with us.
Honestly removing this page would be not pleasant but at least understandable. '''But aggressive and hostile (and in some extreme cases even vicious) reaction in response our attempts to contribute some visual material for this recourse is really a shock.'''
We will appreciate any help in cleaning up the Nick Gabrichidze page according to the Vikipedia standards, if someone can place a request for it will be more then appreciated.
[[User:Gabrichidze|Authors]] 12 : 36 June 21, (UTC)
| |||