Wikipedia:Templates for discussion: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Template:Support]] and [[Template:Object]] and [[Template:Oppose]]: Making things hard often creates more problems than it solves. |
|||
Line 237:
*::This point can be overcome with the addition of a "neutral" template. There already is an image [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Symbol_neutral_vote.png Neutral Vote], so creating a tempate would be simple. --[[User:Fir0002|Fir0002]] 22:39, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - more overcomplication by people who think "votes" around here are actually votes. -- [[User:Cyrius|Cyrius]]|[[User talk:Cyrius|✎]] 01:54, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' all. These are useful in many contexts. A deletion solely based on whether they are needed ''here'' is illogical. The decision about use for voting is a different issue – it must not be decided by a vote for or against a particular template. (I actually sympathize with Mel Etitis' and Angela's concern about [[Wikipedia:sheep vote|sheep votes]], but whether they actually aggravate the problem is questionable. The templates may even make it ''easier'' to spot (and fight, e.g. discount) such votes. I believe that making things intentionally hard often creates more problems than it solves. Such questions should be discussed in a different place, as [[User:Dragons flight|Dragons flight]] said.) — [[User:SebastianHelm|Sebastian]] [[User_talk:SebastianHelm|(talk)]] 02:32, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', on wikipedia, even votes shouldn't be just about numbers. --[[User:Weyes|W]]([[User talk:Weyes|t]]) 02:39, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
*: <s>Why is this a reason against a template for a checkmark that can be used in hundreds of other places? — [[User:SebastianHelm|Sebastian]] [[User_talk:SebastianHelm|(talk)]] 04:07, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)</s>
| |||