Content deleted Content added
Ham Pastrami (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 81:
[[User:Ham Pastrami|Ham Pastrami]] 04:00, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
I disagree. What I really liked about the article was that it showed pretty quickly how active they are, and when the last sampling was done. The web suffers enough from outdated listings. I do agree on the gui builder field (with a coding system to quickly list some features, like being able to interactively design code and gui, or only generate templates from the designer to fill with code) I'd also propose a similar coded field to group some stuff like intellisense behaviour, code documentation tools etc [[User:88.159.74.100|88.159.74.100]] 15:56, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
:How about we keep a uniform month/year stamp for the latest release, so that there is an idea of how active the development is, without having to include the details of version numbers? At least, to me it doesn't seem like comparing version numbers from two different programs really makes sense. [[User:Ham Pastrami|Ham Pastrami]] 10:11, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
== Cygwin ==
| |||