Revision as of 02:44, 18 September 2007 edit Pmanderson (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 62,756 edits →Page is protected. Page has been edited while protected. No protection reason provided here.: tag ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:32, 18 September 2007 edit undo Kim Bruning (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 21,008 edits →Page is protected. Page has been edited while protected. No protection reason provided here.: anyone opposed to unprotecting? Next edit →
Line 643: {{editprotected}} It should be tagged {{tl\|protected}}. There is a case to tag with {{tl\|disputedtag}}, since it is. [[User:Pmanderson\|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson\|PMAnderson]]</small> 02:44, 18 September 2007 (UTC) : {{tl:displutedtag}} is bad news, and probably should be deleted. I also don't think requesting immediate edits is at all handy, and the tag is probably redundant. Generally pages should not be protected for long periods of time. : Xaosflux did post a rationale on my user talk page, but that basically went "do as you see fit", so I guess we ''could'' just unprotect and duck and cover, simply because that is the default action to take. Does anyone have a good reason ''not'' to do that? If so, please speak up now! --[[User:Kim Bruning\|Kim Bruning]] 04:32, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:How to contribute to Wikipedia guidance: Difference between revisions