Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1:
== There is a Dispute on the factual accuracy. ==
It states that [[Media Matters for America]] is a liberal group however Wikipedia's own page does not say this! I'm sure one of the two zealots will quickly add the word on the page now that I've brought this up.
Line 6 ⟶ 5:
There is no dispute on the factual accuracy of this article. The only dispute is on whether or not its appropriate to include the labels "conservative" and "liberal". Of course, there's no dispute that Drudge is conservative (proof is below) or that Conason is liberal (would be happy to post proof for that if requested). The dispute is.. Should we include that in the controversy section? I, and others, say yes. Someone else says no. But it's not appropriate to put a disclaimer disputing the factual basis. [[User:RJSampson|RJSampson]]
...Does every political article on wikipedia run into this non-sense when it's created? This is truly exhausting. [[User:RJSampson|RJSampson]]
==Conservative and Liberal==
| |||