Wikipedia talk:How to contribute to Wikipedia guidance: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Pmanderson (talk | contribs) |
→Page is protected. Page has been edited while protected. No protection reason provided here.: disable editprotected tag |
||
Line 641:
What's up? --[[User:Kim Bruning|Kim Bruning]] 04:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
{{tl|editprotected}}
It should be tagged {{tl|protected}}. There is a case to tag with {{tl|disputedtag}}, since it is. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 02:44, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Line 648:
: Xaosflux did post a rationale on my user talk page, but that basically went "do as you see fit", so I guess we ''could'' just unprotect and duck and cover, simply because that is the default action to take. Does anyone have a good reason ''not'' to do that? If so, please speak up now! --[[User:Kim Bruning|Kim Bruning]] 04:32, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
::Works for me. Since the dispute appears to revolve around policy adoption by proposal, which was a flaming failure for [[WP:ATT]], why don't we just renumber it to #6, and condense the description to "it almost never works" with the category-naming as an example where it did. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 18:00, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
I'm going to disable the editprotected tag. — Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]] · [[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 12:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
| |||