Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Several Monty Python sketches: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:35, 28 September 2007

Revision as of 03:28, 29 September 2007

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''train wreck''' - in any event, no consensus to delete them all, and no clear visibility to what the outcome of individual discussions would be based on this discussion. [[User:GRBerry|GRBerry]] 03:28, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

===Several Monty Python sketches===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|F}}

Line 63 ⟶ 71:

:::*I don't think allowing non-notable plot summary articles to sit around unchallenged for six months is a "rush to judgment." [[User:Otto4711|Otto4711]] 22:33, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

::::Neither do I, and, in fact, I made no such statement. If that is the amount of time they have been "sitting around", however, I could agree that you might have been justified in starting the conversation. However, I believe with at least a few people, myself included, with any luck now engaging in at least some active work on the articles, I think it would be extremely presumptuous to assume that that much time would be required. And I could certainly agree to a potential renomination in a much shorter time if no action were taken in the interim. Actually, if that heppened, I'm fairly sure I'd support deletion myself. But I do think that perhaps a period of one or two months to work on all the articles invovled would not be necessarily onerous. [[User:Warlordjohncarter|John Carter]] 14:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>