Content deleted Content added
MartinSpamer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
TakuyaMurata (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 87:
AIH I ''AM'' an expert in OO. I hold a BSc(Hons) in Computing Science, 15 years development expertise, including 10 in OO Software.
:I think you are new to here presumablly. The definition of OOP is always disputed if you know the history of this article. OOP with use of classes is called class-based OOP and OOP without classes is called object-based OOP. It is a paradigm if you put that in the context of software development, but a style if you compare that with other programming sytles.
Abstraction is tricky question. In some sense, any programming style promotes abstraction. I think reusability and encapsulation is more specific and unique to OOP. I will show my points more in the article.
Besides, some people with good education and good professional experience understand nothing about OOP, though I don't know if you are the case or not. Please show us evidence of your POV not who you are. I hope you can be accustomed to the wikistyle. -- [[User:TakuyaMurata|Taku]] 18:00, Oct 21, 2003 (UTC)
| |||