Content deleted Content added
Stop arguing and make the article more informative. |
TakuyaMurata (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 99:
I would request that anyone of sufficient knowledge consider expanding on the distinction between OOP and standard procedural languages, especially since many OOP languages, notably the two most popular (Java and C++) are still procedural. Many discussions of OOP seem to suggest that objects have a sort of independent existence, as if they were autonomous entities like processes. The idea, for example, that they "communicate", while nice in abstraction, is really not correct, at least not in any way especially different from how functions talk to one another. Objects are not agents, after all, they are special data structures. [[User:Brent Gulanowski|Brent Gulanowski]] 20:05, 24 Oct 2003 (UTC)
:You have a point. My apology for stating OOP as style. Now I think the intro and the definition section is good enough, it is time to rework more following details. -- [[User:TakuyaMurata|Taku]]
| |||