Fixed-point lemma for normal functions: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
SmackBot (talk | contribs)
m Date the maintenance tags using AWB
add a reference and expand some
Line 1:
The '''fixed-point lemma for normal functions''' is a basic result in [[axiomatic set theory]]; it statesstating that any [[normal function]] has arbitrarily large [[fixed point (mathematics)|fixed point]]s and(Levy can1979: oftenp. be used to construct [[ordinal number]]s with interesting properties117). AIt formalwas versionfirst andproved proof (using theby [[Zermelo-FraenkelOswald axiomsVeblen]]) followsin 1908.
 
== Background and formal statement ==
== Formal version ==
A [[normal function]] is a [[proper class|class]] function ''f'' from the class Ord of [[ordinal numbers]] to itself so that:
Let ''f'' : [[ordinal number|Ord]] → Ord be a [[normal function]]. Then for every α ∈ Ord, there exists a β ∈ Ord such that β ≥ α and ''f''(β) = β.
* ''f'' is '''increasing''': ''f''(α) ≤ f(β) whenever α ≤ β.
* ''f'' is '''continuous''': for every limit ordinal &lambda;, ''f''(&lambda;) = sup { f(&alpha;) : &alpha; < &lambda; }.
It can be shown that if ''f'' is normal then ''f'' commutes with [[supremum|suprema]]; for any set ''A'' of ordinals,
:''f''(sup ''A'') = { sup ''f''(&alpha;) : &alpha; ∈ ''A'' }.
A '''fixed point''' of a normal function is an ordinal &beta; such that ''f''(&beta;) = &beta;.
 
The fixed point lemma states that the class of fixed points of any normal function is nonempty and in fact is unbounded: given any ordinal α, there exists an ordinal β such that β ≥ α and ''f''(β) = β.
 
The continuity of the normal function implies the set of fixed points is closed (the supremum of any subset of the class of fixed points is again a fixed point). Thus the fixed point lemma is equivalent to the statement that the fixed points of a normal function form a [[club set|closed and unbounded]] class.
 
== Proof ==
WeThe knowfirst step of the proof is to verify that ''f''(γ) ≥ γ for all ordinals γ and that ''f'' commutes with suprema. WeGiven nowthese declareresults, inductively define an increasing sequence &lt;α<sub>''n''</sub>&gt; (''n'' &lt; ω) by setting α<sub>0</sub> = α, and α<sub>''n''+1</sub> = ''f''(α<sub>''n''</sub>) for ''n'' &lt; ω,. and defineLet β = sup &lt;{α<sub>''n''</sub> : ''n'' ∈ &gtomega;. Clearly}, so β ≥ α. SinceMoreover, because ''f'' commutes with [[supremum|suprema]], we have
:''f''(β) = ''f''(sup {α<sub>''n''</sub> : ''n'' &lt; ω})
:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; = sup {''f''(α<sub>''n''</sub>) : ''n'' &lt; ω}
:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; = sup {α<sub>''n''+1</sub> : ''n'' &lt; ω}
:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; = β
(The last stepequality usesfollows from the fact that the sequence &lt;α<sub>''n''</sub>&gt; increases).
 
== Example application ==
It is easily checked that theThe function ''f'' : Ord → Ord, ''f''(α) = א<sub>α</sub> is normal (see [[aleph number]]);. thusThus, there exists an ordinal Θ such that Θ = א<sub>Θ</sub>. In fact, the above lemma shows that there areis a closed, unbounded infinitelyclass manyof such Θ.
 
==References==
* {{cite book
{{unreferenced||date=June 2006}}
| author = Levy, A.
| title = Basic Set Theory
| year = 1979
| publisher = Springer
| id= Republished, Dover, 2002. ISBN 0-486-42079-5}}
*{{cite journal
| author= Veblen, O.
| authorlink = Oswald Veblen
| title = Continuous increasing functions of finite and transfinite ordinals.
| journal = Trans. Amer. Math Soc.
| volume = 9
| year = 1908
| pages = 280&ndash;292
| id = Available via [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-9947%28190807%299%3A3%3C280%3ACIFOFA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-1 JSTOR]. }}
 
[[Category:Set theory]]