Content deleted Content added
Hult041956 (talk | contribs) →duplicate subject: in favor of very old merge proposal |
|||
Line 17:
:I think these two articles should be merged, but it's a ton of work to do so. --[[User:Jackson|Jackson]] 15:42, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
:It must have been an accident that both were created. Surely, with two nearly identical titles, these two articles must overlap a great deal. The articles are among the oldest marked for merger consideration (almost a year); yet almost no discussion of this proposal has taken place. It ''is'' a lot of work, but it can be done in pieces. Are there any objections to doing so? [[User:Hult041956|Hult041956]] 21:54, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
| |||