Content deleted Content added
→high level language: new section |
|||
Line 143:
Ideally suited to reflection... what a strong statement, and sorry, that is definitely not the state of the art. Other implicit assumptions, such as source code being available as a string as opposed to an abstract syntax tree, have been negated more than 40 years ago, too. -- [[User:Zickzack|Zz]] 09:56, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
== high level language ==
The classification of languages as 'high level' or 'low level' is almost never useful. This article is another example where it adds nothing except confusion. [[User:150.101.166.15|150.101.166.15]] 08:47, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
| |||