Revision as of 15:34, 10 February 2006 edit Rklawton (talk \| contribs) Administrators 40,722 edits "LIFO not allowed" reversion ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:26, 24 October 2007 edit undo Fabartus (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 21,651 edits →It occurs to me: new section Next edit →
Line 17: Reverted edit stating "(that is why LIFO is usually not allowed)". This information was not referenced. Accounting practices vary between countries. [[User:Rklawton\|Rklawton]] 15:34, 10 February 2006 (UTC) == It occurs to me == [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FIFO&oldid=166804577 after] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FIFO&diff=166804577&oldid=166708906 THIS CHANGE], that the article has been slanted by the experience and knowledge of it's contributors without understanding the distinctions involved into one that is essentially a computing article. LIFO and FIFO are in essence [[Information Theory]] topics which are implemented in computing as [[stack (data structure)]] and [[queue (data structure)]], for computer manipulation of data. Management science and certainly accounting use of the same term suggests perhaps both these topics be rewritten to be a general Information sciences treatment and leave the computer implementations to the articles on stacks and queues! *I've accordingly added the cats: {{catlist\| Cybernetics \| Discrete mathematics \| Information theory}} to see if some other eyes have a interest in this point. // <b>[[User:Fabartus\|Fra]]</b><font color="green">[[User talk:Fabartus\|nkB]]</font> 20:26, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Talk:FIFO (computing and electronics): Difference between revisions