Content deleted Content added
Radagast83 (talk | contribs) |
Hult041956 (talk | contribs) →duplicate subject: the merge has been done |
||
Line 19:
:It must have been an accident that both were created. Surely, with two nearly identical titles, these two articles must overlap a great deal. The articles are among the oldest marked for merger consideration (almost a year); yet almost no discussion of this proposal has taken place. It ''is'' a lot of work, but it can be done in pieces. Are there any objections to doing so? [[User:Hult041956|Hult041956]] 21:54, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
::Go for it if you think you can do it! [[User:Radagast83|Radagast83]] 04:41, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
:::I had both article sitting on my desk in hard-copy, getting psyched up to scale this mountain. This morning I see you got there first. ;-) Congratulations. There was a ton of stuff in both articles. To what extent did you actually manage to ''merge'' it all? [[User:Hult041956|Hult041956]] 16:04, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
| |||