Content deleted Content added
Stevenzenith (talk | contribs) |
OtterSmith (talk | contribs) →occam 3: occam pi ? |
||
Line 128:
:: There is no reason at all to suppose that someone would go anywhere looking for information about Occam 3 as far as I can tell. No one has yet offered evidence that it either is or (was) real in any meaningful sense. --[[User:Stevenzenith|Steven Zenith]] 01:52, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
::: I had previously heard of occam-pi and thought that it was occam-3, only with some kind of Knuthian numbering to perfection scheme.
| |||