Content deleted Content added
m removing old RFC |
|||
Line 146:
::: Even better is : http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/context/81540/0 - yes I agree. It is disappointing, however, that Barrett has not referenced his co-authors, myself and David May included. --[[User:Stevenzenith|Steven Zenith]] 21:03, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
So, to summarise: myself and [[User:OtterSmith]] are in favour, [[User:Stevenzenith]] is now in favour after initial scepticism, [[User:Wizzy]] will go along with Stevenzenith, and we can assume [[User:Gwizard]] is against. I suggest the motion is therefore carried. [[User:Letdorf|Letdorf]] 10:57, 12 November 2007 (UTC).
|