Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
I see
That's a wilful bald-faced deceptive rhetorical lie and you know it
Line 150:
 
::I see. Would you be happy if I added ISO 8601 (whichever flavour you nominate) as a fourth dynamic format? That way it could be listed in the manual of style as an acceptable alternative. -- [[User:Tim Starling|Tim Starling]] 07:31, Nov 13, 2003 (UTC)
 
::Ec, why are you claiming [[February 11]] is in accordance with ISO 8601? That's a wilful bald-faced deceptive rhetorical lie and you know it ;) Do you want support for negative years as well? -- [[User:Tim Starling|Tim Starling]] 07:50, Nov 13, 2003 (UTC)