Content deleted Content added
→Protected and discussion page: comments |
→Moving forward: findings from more studies. |
||
Line 119:
==Moving forward==
The link to a review article that was recently added was very helpful. Check it out [http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbme/v10n2/en_a06v10n2.pdf here] I can't tell if it was peer reviewed, but it surveys and summarizes the results from 58 other academic papers. For one it found "In summary, EPOC resulting from a single resistance exercise session does not represent a great impact on energy balance; however its cumulative effect may be relevant." It noted a lot of other interesting results such as a few more that estimate the size of the effect and one that I had previously seen that found the effect to last at least to a small degree up to 48 hours. It also mentions lipid metabolism effects of strength training. Some studies found greater utilization of fat for energy production (as a percentage of total energy use it seems, not necessarily greater total energy use), but one by Melanson "demonstrated that 24-h fat oxidation (measured in a calorimetry chamber) was not statistically different between days when subjects performed aerobic or resistance exercises and no exercise, the control situation." I will try to work these into the draft or regular article when I get a chance, but anyone else feel free. - [[User:Taxman|Taxman]] 18:07, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)
:Seeking to find as many sources as I can to answer the issue either way, I found a few more in a row that did not support the finding of greater fat loss of resistance training over endurance training. [http://www.acsm-msse.com/pt/re/msse/abstract.00005768-200211000-00016.htm;jsessionid=CV878JwBdW2r0EiJEKeJ22717PWZEyjkQu8tI5P6lfOHfrWlv5o1!884695698!-949856031!9001!-1 Here's] the abstract for the Melanson study that specifically did measure the participants in a calorimeter and concluded "24-h fat and protein oxidation were the same on BK [aerobic], WTS [weight training], and Con [control - non exercise] days." Info in brackets is mine for explanation. Further "Conclusion: In men, resistance exercise has a similar effect on 24-h EE and macronutrient oxidation as a comparable bout of aerobic exercise. Neither exercise produced an increase in 24-h fat oxidation above that observed on a nonexercise control day." The abstract describes the exercise protocol and gives the summary data of the tests. [http://www.ms-se.com/pt/re/msse/abstract.00005768-199609000-00009.htm;jsessionid=CV7MNKv8ljYE7B2JmjqOMX7h3KJl8fC6GmZy9PFFfK5PFuj0wPOs!884695698!-949856031!9001!-1 Another study] found no difference in lipid oxidation between a low intensity and a high intensity workout of equivalent work output, though the HI regime did find greater 24hr overall energy use. From the definition of work, I think that means the exercise regimes themselves were not time or calorie equivalent, but I'd have to check that. And finally [http://www.ncsf.org/tools/articles/articles-restistancetrainginwomen.aspx another] that "hypothesized that women would demonstrate increased energy expenditure in addition to increased fat oxidation post-exercise." found instead "The results from the study were somewhat surprising. Although energy expenditure for the twenty-four hour period surrounding the resistance training program was significantly elevated, both fat and protein oxidation values were not significantly different." I'll try to work these in as appropriate, but so far I haven't seen any other studies that find greater fat loss in weight training vs aerobic. They could be out there though. - [[User:Taxman|Taxman]] 18:55, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
== Unprotect ==
| |||