Revision as of 18:39, 23 September 2007 edit Pombredanne (talk \| contribs) 31 edits /How to make this article better ?/ Added a section to discuss how to make this ide comparison better. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:29, 23 November 2007 edit undo Ike-bana (talk \| contribs) 4,958 edits The Eclipse Foundation does not write code. Next edit →
Line 118: *Remove cost field entirely. This places the responsibility of doing cost research on the reader. However, you can still kind of distinguish price range by looking at the license type. For example, open source licenses usually imply cost-free software. [[User:Ham Pastrami\|Ham Pastrami]] 23:08, 19 September 2007 (UTC) == Crediting the Eclipse Foundation == The Eclipse Foundation is a not-for-profit organization like the Apache Foundation. The staff employed by the foundation do not write the code for the plug-ins and frameworks that are available from eclipse.org. I don't think it's proper to credit them as being the "Developers" of the various IDEs that are built on top of Eclipse. Is there some proper way to credit the "Community"? --[[User:Rcjsuen\|Remy Suen]] ([[User talk:Rcjsuen\|talk]]) 22:29, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Comparison of integrated development environments: Difference between revisions