Problem of multiple generality: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Egriffin (talk | contribs)
Changed logical formulas
Egriffin (talk | contribs)
Might as well use letters m and c instead of x and y.
Line 17:
 
:''For every mouse m, there exists a cat c, such that c is feared by m,''
:<math>\forall xm. \, \text{Mouse}(xm) \rightarrow \exists yc. \, \text{Cat}(yc) \land \text{Fears}(xm,yc)</math>
 
in which case the conclusion is trivial.
Line 24:
 
:''There exists a cat c, such that for every mouse m, c is feared by m.''
:<math>\exists yc. \, \text{Cat}(yc) \land \forall xm. \, \text{Mouse}(xm) \rightarrow \text{Fears}(xm,yc)</math>
 
This example illustrates the importance of specifying the scope of quantifiers as ''for all'' and ''there exists''.