Talk:Middleware (distributed applications): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Samehz (talk | contribs)
Line 92:
I added a simple definition - from a perspective that predates the various hypes described above (but covering several of the above definitions). It seems there are two perspectives: the application structure perspective (with references e.g. to CORBA), and the more technical operating system structure perspective. I chose the latter. Well, it may be a rather wide definition, but it also shows e.g. why CMS is not to be considered middleware, and why development tools are not middleware.
[[User:Rbakels|Rbakels]] 08:35, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 
== Why Oracle was added to the Organizations sector? ==
 
Oracle is not that much a player in the Middleware sector. Right about their talks to acquire BEA to enhance their Middleware offering, somebody adds them as a key player in the Middleware Organizations section. What does that mean?
 
I added BEA to IBM and removed Oracle. If somebody thinks this is not right, please revert back to mentioning IBM only.
 
Thanks
[[User:Samehz|SZ]] 06:59, 1 December 2007 (UTC)